Enough Perhaps of Fun and Games
When we are armed by laughter, we tend, too often, to treat others as objects.
The more we poke rather vicious fun at the extreme activities of the other Party, we contribute to the contempt which people have for both parties and increase the extent to which we see each other as objects, as identities, as Republicans or Democrats, rather than people.
Humor can be the salve that tempers the hurts of life. It may be, as some have alleged, the preferred language of God. I find it is one of the few things of life that I can’t seem to get enough of. Still, there is danger in our excess.
I personally think the cartoon wars and meme knocks are being won by Democrats. You may think by Republicans. Both have made me laugh.
But now is a time to discuss with civility and humility. We are neither at the spring from which the river flows, nor a paddle or two from the waterfall. These are, as Loren Eisley once said of our civilization the long adolescence of our understanding, a time for learning. I keep asking for the conversations that bring us together, not the humor that drives us apart—time spent getting to know each other better as a person, not as simply “the other,” a member of that “group,” that identity.
David Brooks in today NYT closes his column with this passage.
People are amazingly quick to drop stereotypes when they meet an actual individual. You may distrust lawyers but Mary, who is a lawyer, seems quite nice….
In conversation people are not objects, but ongoing narrators of their own lives, navigating between their multiple identities, steering through certainties and doubts, and refining their categories through contact with others.
I tried to find the quote I remember from Eisley. I could not find it, but discovered this. It is the same idea.
We are at the beginning of our adult life as a species. Forget the clannish jibs of childhood and cliques of adolescence.
We need to gather what few insights we and our ancestors have found along the path and carry them forward together on this, the only journey we will ever know. As we travel let us use the precious time we each have left, to speak to each other about how we might lesson the load that others carry, ease the suffering that so many bare and feel more simply and with greater reverence the wonder of life.
I think that the Eiseley "adolescence" reference is from "Man of the Future," one of the essays in The Immense Journey.
I think many of us laugh as a defensive mechanism when we come across things that are scary, stupid, or absurd.
I wanted to comment on your last post but comments don't seem to be enabled. So here it goes. I was in Fruita Colorado last month. While there, I fell and broke my wrist. After walking 10 miles in the desert and then driving myself to the hospital, they wrapped up my wrist and told me I needed to get home for surgery. In the meantime, I called my employer for insurance info since I couldn't find my card. The hospital gave me a prescription for pain killer. As I pulled into the drug store my phone rang and it was my employer.
I'll set the scene. The parking lot was about half full with entire sections unoccupied by cars. I pulled in taking up 2 spaces, a little bit out of the way, and answered my phone. My engine was running, and I was behind the wheel. A guy got out of a car and started yelling at me. He said: "if you're going to come to our town, you need to park like normal. Park between the lines". I told him: "I'm not parked". He yelled some more and gave me the finger and eventually left.
This stuck me on a number of levels. I had time to think about it on my 1673 mile drive home. For one thing, this guy, let's call him the parking lot nazi, expressed a belief that either he was speaking for "his town" or had some kind of authority as a resident of the town. I'm not convinced he was acting in an official capacity or delegated authority. I also find the thing about our town vs your town as alien to me, I think I can find something about it in the Constitution.
Another thing that struck me is that I was sitting in a parking lot of a national chain. Does he think the national chain is his or perhaps belongs to his town? He also never even tried to claim he was Mr. Walgreen, or had just purchased the company, nor that he works there. He was a customer. In fact, he was a customer at a store that to my knowledge, is private property. It's not his or his town's at all.
But the one thing that really struck me is the expectation that to be free is to stay between the lines.